Title: Comment: The title is informative and relevant on the content and aligned with the objectives in the research paper. I see there is a related between a title and Manuscript.

Abstract: Comment: The researcher giving general information and sufficient about the topic being studied in his research paper. The study outline in the research is correspond to the objective.

Introduction:
Comment: The introduction is informative and the objectives are clear. The citation from other studies is clear and understandable in the research paper.

Methodology: Comment: The methodology is clear and explain the methods which used in the research paper by the best description. Also the variables are defined and measured appropriately. The study methods are valid and reliable. There is enough detail in order to replicate the study in the future.

Results: Comment: The data is presented in an appropriate way and the tables and figures relevant clearly presented and categories grouped appropriately. The labelled of Titles, columns, and rows wrote in correctly and clearly. The statistically significant result is clear and understandable and the practically meaningful result is clear about what is it. The texts in the results are add to the data by clearly method.

Conclusions: Comment: The results are discussed from multiple angles and placed into context clearly and also the conclusions answered the aims of the study in the research paper. The conclusions are supported by results. The researcher's ideas are consistent and are logically and linguistically interconnected. references: Comment: The citation from other studies is clear and understandable in the research paper and appropriate key studies are included. The references wrote in the clearly and accepted way. The references are relevant and referenced correctly.

Overall:
Comment: The paper was very clear and covered all the objective of it. The study design was appropriate and the article is consistent within itself.
The main flaws in this article were the researcher's commitment to grammar and spelling is weak and the need for proofreading.

Overall statement: Comment: Major points in the article which needs clarification, refinement, reanalysis, rewrites and/or additional 1. Figures and tables needs more clarification. 2. The inconsistencies are few in the results. 3. The researcher did not mention or talk about the importance of the scientific research he carried out.