Content of review 1, reviewed on October 13, 2020
The article title is attractive and concise. The results are excellent. Authors have discussed the physical interpretation in a good manner.
The introduction section is needed to be improved. Recently published articles should be added into the introduction section.
The methodology used in the paper is powerful. Results are excellent. Authors should show the efficiency of the method by comparing the obtained results with the existing ones.
Results are excellent. Also the data described in the paper are listed in a good fashion. The authors discussed the results in details.
The discussion and conclusion section of the paper is written in a good manner, but more explanation is needed for a better understanding.
Source
© 2020 the Reviewer.