Content of review 1, reviewed on September 29, 2020
Comments on
Abstract The abstract have clear goal. But it have a number of mathematical variables. It is better explain it in sentence form. For instance, nx=0,ny=0....
2.Title:-is to long, rectification is highly recommended
3.References:-Well organized
Comments on introduction/background
The author should justify better the paper. In particular, the novelty should be more emphasized. In addition, the advantages of the present approach with respect others should be highlighted in a clearer manner.
Comments on methodology
The methodology explained in remarkable way.
Comments on data and results
The data and the analysis of the data investigated based on the methodology used. So, the result discussed in the is excellent and scientifically acceptable.
Comments on discussion and
On the discussion part the author should elaborate in detail with concise sentences
conclusions
Excellent
Source
© 2020 the Reviewer.
References
F., M., M., M. S. C., E., C., N., R. J. 2020. Evaluation of exact electro-elastic static and free vibration solutions of multilayered plates for benchmarking: Piezoelectric composite laminates and soft core sandwich plates. Composites Part C: Open Access.
