Content of review 1, reviewed on August 07, 2020
the aim of the study was clear, what found in the study also clear and the abstract was informative. the title was relative, informative and clear. the references are organized, relevant but most of them not recent, and very old need to be updated.
Comments on introduction/background
in this paper the author is explain clearly what is already known about this topic, and answer the research question clearly outlined.
Comments on methodology
most of the variables defined here were measured appropriately and the study methods valid and reliable. there is enough detail to replicate the study.
Comments on data and results
the result was clear and well organized, well analyzed, presented in an appropriate way, tables and figures relevant and clearly presented. Titles, columns, and rows labelled correctly and clearly. the text in the results add to the data or is it repetitive.
Comments on discussion and conclusions
the results discussed from multiple angles and placed into context without being overinterpreted, the conclusions answer the aims of the study.
Major points in the article which needs clarification and suggestions for what could be done to improve the article.
only the references need to be updated.
Source
© 2020 the Reviewer.
References
Rachel, C., Natasha, T., G., J. K., Virag, S., Nick, d. P., S., M. J., J., L. S., Kay-Tee, K., C., K. G. G. 2017. Association between urinary biomarkers of total sugars intake and measures of obesity in a cross-sectional study. Plos One.