Comments on abstract, title, references

Abstract- 1. Main article is matching with the abstract 2. It is showing research perspectives covered in article.

Title: Title is matching with article, however it can be modified little bit to express in more efficient manner.

References: References are relevant and up to date.

Comments on introduction/background

1. This article has clearly outlined the background for their review.
2. Clearly explained the importance of the omics approach.
3. Every sentence is well referring to the appropriate references.

Comments on methodology

Since its a review paper, can't give specific comment on methodology.

Comments on data and results

1. Figures to explain review directly link to reader. well elaborated figures. 2.Figures are clearly presented and placed at appropriate places.

Comments on discussion and conclusions

1. very well described and filled the gap of knowledge.
2. Suggested future endeavors 3.included own suggestion along with description of other's finding.

Overall statement or summary of the article and its findings in your own words

Authors have very well described all the omics approaches and their application in host pathogen interaction.

Overall strengths of the article and what impact it might have in your field

Authors explained not only advantages but limitation of omics approaches. It is a multi directional review.

Specific comments on weaknesses of the article and what could be done to improve it

Minor revision: Translatome can be explained little bit more as it has significant role in host pathogen interaction.