Comments on abstract, title, references

Title: Title is brief and informative. It includes relevant descriptive keywords that readers can search for. In short, authors have formulated a clear title

Abstract: Authors are clear a bit with their aim of comparing emergency medicine based RMPHEC-GMEs. They should have been more clear with their recommendations for other residency programs. The amount of information presented in the abstract should be more, to tell the whole story about the paper in a clear general summary by elaborating upon each major aspect of the paper

References: References are fine. Cited correctly and appropriate key studies have been included

Comments on introduction/background

Author have presented this section in a very clear way. Background literature search is appropriate

Comments on methodology

Methods of comparing EM based RMPHEC-GMEs are valid and reliable

Comments on data and results

Authors have reviewed and presented various residency programs in an appropriate and understandable way. Outcomes are clear

Comments on discussion and conclusions

Results placed in discussion section are into context without being over interpreted. Authors are clear with their discussion about emerging areas in which EM and public health are intimately tied together and about providing health services for marginalized communities