Applying the scientific method to map traditional knowledge, such as the Māori whakapapa, while respecting both Aristotelian logic and the narrative nature of human pedigrees—which the authors recognize as "not necessarily objectively true" (page 6, line 24)—is undoubtedly challenging. However, the current article succeeds in doing so, effectively encompassing both aspects of the analysis. In my opinion, this paper is well-structured and ready for publication.

While I do not necessarily agree with all the authors' statements regarding "historicization" and "textualization" as forms of "cultural colonization", I am pleased to see an article addressing these concepts and articulating them within a formal approach to chronology.

I noted a few areas for improvement:

• Abstract: The word "time" is missing. I suggest adding it for clarity.

* Page 10, lines 32–33: A reference to Fabian 2014 could be added alongside Said and Gibbons, as it aligns perfectly with the context.

Additionally, I have attached the PDF with 7 comments.