Content of review 1, reviewed on April 13, 2024
Basic reporting The paper is well-organized and offers a clear narrative that effectively highlights the differences between the AI models in a clinical context. While, I have outlined some specific areas where enhancements could be made to further strengthen your submission.
- Provide a more detailed description of vignette selection and construction to ensure replicability and discuss the ethical implications of using AI for mental health assessments.
- Improve grammar and style for clarity and professionalism, ensure consistent terminology throughout the paper, and update and standardize reference formatting. Experimental design The methodology section is thorough and provides a solid foundation for the study. Validity of the findings The discussion aligns well with the results, offering thoughtful interpretation and implications for future research and practice.
Source
© 2024 the Reviewer (CC BY 4.0).
References
Shiri, S., Zohar, E., Inbar, L. 2024. The impact of history of depression and access to weapons on suicide risk assessment: a comparison of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4. PeerJ.
