Content of review 1, reviewed on May 18, 2024

A well written paper overall.
Two elements of the COREQ critical appraisal guidelines have been omitted- detail relating to the relationship between the researchers and participants and sampling strategy identified.
Was there any attempt to validate the interview/topic guide? Who and how were these questions devised?
The results section seems overly long and could be reduced.

Source

    © 2024 the Reviewer.

Content of review 2, reviewed on July 13, 2024

I am satisfied with the amendments made.

Source

    © 2024 the Reviewer.

Content of review 3, reviewed on September 23, 2024

I am satisfied with the changes that have been made and recommend publication of the manuscript.

Source

    © 2024 the Reviewer.