Content of review 1, reviewed on October 16, 2023

Recommendation Accepted with minor revisions . Comments to the authors

Congratulations to the authors who studied an interesting topic and wrote a good paper. The article needs some minor corrections as mentioned below:

  1. In Materials and Methods

Table number one: The percentages of the chemical composition of the metal used must be compared with the standard metal for the same alloy, and the reference must be added to the alloy that was compared with it in the table, and the same method with Table 2.

  1. In Result and Discussion

Discuss the results and comparing it's with some recent published work

  1. In Conclusion :

  2. What disadvantages of this study can be noted and how can they be eliminated in the future?

Source

    © 2023 the Reviewer (CC BY 4.0).

References

    Mgbemena, C., Onyegu, S. O. 2023. Optimized Material Removal and Tool Wear Rates in Milling API 5ST TS-90 Alloy: AI-Driven Optimization and Modelling with ANN, ANFIS, and RSM. Qeios.