Content of review 1, reviewed on May 04, 2021
Thank you so much for this opportunity to revise this article and thanks for authors for their hard work, These are my notes, The aim is clear The study found was clear. The title was informative and relevant. The references are relevant, recent, referenced correctly and appropriate key studies included. The topic is clear. The research question is clearly outlined. The research question justified given what’s already know about topic.
The process of subject selection is clear. The variables are defined and measured appropriately. The methods are valid and reliable. There are enough details to replicate the Study. The data is presented in an appropriate way. Tables and figures are clearly presented and relevant. Titles, raws and columns are labelled correctly There are appropriate units, rounds and number of decimals. Catigories are grouped correctly The Text add to result add to data.
The statically significant is clear but the practically significant is not. The results are discussed from multiple angles and placed into context without being interpreted.
The conclusions conclusion is not convincing all these findings The conclusions supported by results. The limitations of the study are fatal as authors mentioning strength of their study anywhere, discussion is not well constructed and need to cite recent literature, conclusion is not adequate and need to support the data and aim of the study.
Source
© 2021 the Reviewer.