Comments on abstract, title, references

title : the title is informative and relevant aims : the aims is not clearly stated. findings : the abstract did not state specific findings, the methods clearly stated. references: relevant, recent, correctly referred, and key reference already included

Comments on introduction/background

the research question is not clearly outlined. the writer only write the issues around the topic

Comments on methodology

the subject selection process is pretty clear. However, the parameters within each variable were not defined properly. Therefore, it will be difficult to reproduce this research

Comments on data and results

data presented in appropriate way and the results are presented clear enough

Comments on discussion and conclusions

the discussion is well written, the conclusions are on point and answering the paper aims, the conclusions supported by references, there is no information regarding future research opportunity

overall statement

Tourism filed is often overlooked by the concept of sustainability of supply chain management. This article found that the SSCM application in the field of tourism is important but challenging.

Overall strengths of the article and what impact it might have in your field

This article catches an important issues in sustainable supply chain management as tourism is one of the most profitable sector in the world. More research in terms of SSCM application on tourism field are expected in the future and this article could help our tourism sector more profitable and sustainable.

Specific comments on weaknesses of the article and what could be done to improve it

1. please revise the abstract according to the comments in the above section
2. please revise the introductions by clearly stating your paper objectives