) Abstract is unbalanced and really poor. Only a direct access to the objective. Where is the gap that the authors have addressed. What are issues this paper is going to solve? 2) The authors need to reduce Abstract details. Then, they need to mention how their objective will be implemented. Next, the expected results (or obtained results), depending o the progress of the proposed method, needs to be mentioned. Future works, limitations, and drawbacks of the proposed method need to be there in order to enable reader have a clear picture on the research. 3) Authors need to add a main flowchart to include the main steps of their proposed method. 4) Figures are poor in terms of quality and font size.

The paper can be accepted for publication after these comments have been addressed.