Tweet Review
Content of review 1, reviewed on September 04, 2023
Dear authors,
The aim of the study was to examine the reliability in the assessment of 6 signs of pathological tooth wear and 18 clinical signs and symptoms determining etiology, all of which are included in the TWES 2.0/DC-TW.
It is a nice and well-written paper addressing an interesting topic on the management of tooth wear.
I would like to complement you with this manuscript and I only have some minor comments:
The statement “So far, no other studies have systematically investigated the reliability of tooth wear qualification” seems to be SPIN (Pereira, J Dent 2022). I would advise to rewrite this sentence.
Moreover, I would advise to rewrite your conclusions to make these more focussed.
Source
© 2023 the Reviewer.
Content of review 2, reviewed on September 28, 2023
Thank you for the adjustments and clarification.
Source
© 2023 the Reviewer.
Content of review 3, reviewed on November 15, 2023
Thank you for the adjustements
Source
© 2023 the Reviewer.
References
C., R. J., Lukasz, K., A., J. H., Peter, W., Oliver, A. M. 2024. Tooth Wear Evaluation System 2.0-Evaluation of diagnostic reliability in the assessment of signs and symptoms for tooth wear by non-experts. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.
