Content of review 1, reviewed on September 10, 2015

High Average Low No Answer Originality / Novelty ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Significance of Content ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Quality of Presentation ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Scientific Soundness ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Interest to the readers ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Overall Merit ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Overall Recommendation ( ) Accept in present form (x) Accept after minor revision ( ) Reconsider after major revision ( ) Reject English Language and Style ( ) English language and style are fine (x) Minor spell check required ( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required ( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English Language and Style Comments and Suggestions for Authors Please see the changes I am suggesting in the attached file. Just minor changes.

peer-review-893569.v1.docx Comments for Editors (will not be revealed to authors) This can be published after taking my comments inserted as track changes into consideration.

Source

    © 2015 the Reviewer (CC BY 4.0).