Content of review 1, reviewed on September 10, 2015
High Average Low No Answer
Originality / Novelty ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Significance of Content ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Quality of Presentation ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Scientific Soundness ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Interest to the readers ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Overall Merit ( ) (x) ( ) ( )
Overall Recommendation
( ) Accept in present form
(x) Accept after minor revision
( ) Reconsider after major revision
( ) Reject
English Language and Style
( ) English language and style are fine
(x) Minor spell check required
( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English Language and Style
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
Please see the changes I am suggesting in the attached file. Just minor changes.
peer-review-893569.v1.docx Comments for Editors (will not be revealed to authors) This can be published after taking my comments inserted as track changes into consideration.
Source
© 2015 the Reviewer (CC BY 4.0).