Content of review 1, reviewed on September 29, 2020

Comments on

Abstract The abstract have clear goal. But it have a number of mathematical variables. It is better explain it in sentence form. For instance, nx=0,ny=0....

2.Title:-is to long, rectification is highly recommended

3.References:-Well organized

Comments on introduction/background

The author should justify better the paper. In particular, the novelty should be more emphasized. In addition, the advantages of the present approach with respect others should be highlighted in a clearer manner.

Comments on methodology

The methodology explained in remarkable way.

Comments on data and results

The data and the analysis of the data investigated based on the methodology used. So, the result discussed in the is excellent and scientifically acceptable.

Comments on discussion and

On the discussion part the author should elaborate in detail with concise sentences

conclusions

Excellent

Source

    © 2020 the Reviewer.

References

    F., M., M., M. S. C., E., C., N., R. J. 2020. Evaluation of exact electro-elastic static and free vibration solutions of multilayered plates for benchmarking: Piezoelectric composite laminates and soft core sandwich plates. Composites Part C: Open Access.