Author/s’ experience

Where you can, please make some brief comments on the author/s’ experience. This could be as simple as noting that the authors appear to be senior/junior researchers, after a cursory review of their published papers in any search against their names.

Methodology

This should be the main substance of your review. In your assessment, is the methodology sound? Please endeavour to distinguish between fundamentally weak methodological practice and limitations which may be acceptable (but are still important to flag) due to the inherently rapid nature of this research.

Research integrity

Where possible, please comment on areas of potential plagiarism, misconduct (such as data falsification or fabrication), or other ethical implications such as lacking ethics approval for animal/human studies.

Conflicts of interest

Do you have any conflicts of interest here? No.

Basis of the findings

Are there any logic jumps that you consider important to flag here? For example, are the findings/conclusions overstated?