Content of review 1, reviewed on February 02, 2025
The manuscript has been presented in a simple manner. However, the manuscript has some weaknesses, which make publication in a scientific journal rather questionable. To name a few:
1- The title of the manuscript is not clear. The title should be informative, specific, clearly and accurately indicate the contents of the manuscript.
2- Please re-write the abstract focusing on what is new and what is the achievement. Please add some structural charactiristics of developed materials to the abstract. The abstract should be informative by presenting both the quantitative and qualitative information.
3- The literature review requires more depth and breadth, as the author has not sufficiently engaged with the full scope of existing research on the topic, leading to potential gaps in understanding or misinterpretations of the field's current state.
4- What are the limitations of this study and modeling? I recommend the authors to highlight this topic.
5- Obtained results must be compared with other related literature. Summarizing the data in Table is highly recommended.
Source
© 2025 the Reviewer.
Content of review 2, reviewed on March 02, 2025
The authors have addressed the reviewer's concerns. It could be published.
Source
© 2025 the Reviewer.
