Content of review 1, reviewed on January 04, 2016

This commentary describes the international Fish-T1K ("Transcriptomes of 1,000 Fishes") project that aims to "generate genome-wide transcriptome sequences for 1,000 diverse species of ray-finned fishes using RNA-seq". For this review report, I have focussed on the text and figures/tables only, not on the Fish-T1K project as such. I have no major comments or issues with the text as it is presented. There are a few textual suggestions that I will list at the end of this review. My only substantial comments are:

- I propose to merge Figure 2 and Suppl. Figure S1 into one table. There is no additional benefit of using pie charts to represent these data. Combining into one table has the added benefit of showing how Fish-T1K is already expand the scope of organisms for which transcriptome data are available
- I suggest adding a link in the section on "SOPs and best practices" to where SOPs are made available: http://www.fisht1k.org/law/protocol
- I suggest to represent that data of Suppl. fig. S2. in a line plot with two lines, one for the number of transcriptomes, and the other for the cumulative number of transcriptomes. The current representation is confusing (it took me a bit of time to understand what the numbers in the legend referred to). I have added an example plot as attachment to this review report.

Textual comments:
page 4, line 74: high-throughput, please us throughput
page 6, line 116: "Fish-T1K Steering Committee consists" —> "the Fish-T1K Steering Committee consists"
page 7, line 124: "In the past two years, Fish-T1K Team has established" —> "In the past two years, the Fish-T1K Team has established"
page 7, line 147: "This would be helpful in establishing" —> "This will be helpful in establishing"
page 11, line 220: "Fish-T1K will greatly prompt the study" —> "Fish-T1K will greatly enhance the study"

Level of interest

Please indicate how interesting you found the manuscript:
An article whose findings are important to those with closely related research interests

Quality of written English

Please indicate the quality of language in the manuscript:
Needs some language corrections before being published.

Declaration of competing interests

Please complete a declaration of competing interests, considering the following questions:

1. Have you in the past five years received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from
an organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this
manuscript, either now or in the future?


2. Do you hold any stocks or shares in an organisation that may in any way gain or lose
financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future?

3. Do you hold or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the
manuscript?

4. Have you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that
holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript?

5. Do you have any other financial competing interests?

6. Do you have any non-financial competing interests in relation to this paper?

If you can answer no to all of the above, write 'I declare that I have no competing interests'
below. If your reply is yes to any, please give details below.

I declare that I have no competing interests.

I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal. I understand that my name will be included
on my report to the authors and, if the manuscript is accepted for publication, my named report
including any attachments I upload will be posted on the website along with the authors'
responses. I agree for my report to be made available under an Open Access Creative Commons
CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). I understand that any comments
which I do not wish to be included in my named report can be included as confidential comments
to the editors, which will not be published.

I agree to the open peer review policy of the journal.

Authors' response to reviews: (http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/imedia/1663202291201113_comment.pdf)

The example graph for SF2 can be seen here: (https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0V9UazwxfgRbzd1a1lIRkllN00))

 


Source

    © 2016 the Reviewer (CC BY 4.0 - source).

References

    Ying, S., Yu, H., Xiaofeng, L., C., B. C., Zhuocheng, Z., Zhixiang, Y., A., C. K., Yong, Z., Xiaomeng, Z., Min, W., Alex, W., Chao, F., Xinhui, Z., Hai, H., V., L. J., Kirk, K., Yong, Z., Guillermo, O., Byrappa, V., Qiong, S. 2016. Fish-T1K (Transcriptomes of 1,000 Fishes) Project: large-scale transcriptome data for fish evolution studies. GigaScience.