Content of review 1, reviewed on May 01, 2019

Comments on abstract, title, references

Abstract : The objective of the study is clear. The study summary indicated the use of the planning and implementation technique (SBA) among the teachers. During this study, Alpha Cronbach 0.917 and samples of teachers (589 teachers) were used and 4 random samples were taken from these teachers to interview them.The results of these interviews and interviews were the result of this study. Title: match within Matches the content contained in the Study. References: about 22 reference, Referenced correctly referring, keywords studies were included appropriate.

Comments on introduction/background

The Introduction explain clearly this study , The citation from 2 sources and Introduction included general idea of the content of the contained in chapter. Study question justify what is already know about this study.

Comments on methodology

  • Subject Selection: Select of a topic is clear and indicate the content of the Study.
  • The variables defined and measured appropriately: The variables are defined and defined clearly and according to fixed measures.
  • The study methods valid and reliable: This study used the Statical Package For The Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0. to get the value of the coefficient of reliability (Alpha Cronbach's). The methodology of the article is correct ( Problem Statement, The Purpose of the Study, Literature Review, Research Methodology, Findings "Status of Teacher Planning: Status of Implementation Assessment: Status of Construction Instruments" , Discussion and Summary, all statistical results calculated excellently and reliability degree is very good. Indicating that interviews a few samples for teachers number (4) editors gave the reasons for this to time constraints.
  • Details of Study: That what has been put forward in this study as far enough at the present time, It is possible to replicate the study with advanced concepts.

Comments on data and results

  • The data presented:
  • The Categories grouped appropriately.
  • Tables: ( 4 tables ) relevant with study and statistical analysis and clearly presented.
  • A statistically results significant and qualification with procedures of study.
  • That clear a result practically meaningful .

Comments on discussion and conclusions

  • Discussion:
  • That will be better if a stud included a many of samples of interviews with More of number of teaches to be Accurate to compare with the results and conclusions of the study.
  • Proposing a future work format for advanced studies on the topic of the study.
  • Summary:
  • The results of study answer the aims of the study.
  • The results supported by references and finding.
  • The limitations of the study are they opportunities to inform future.

Source

    © 2019 the Reviewer.

References

    K., S. P., Sushil, . 2017. Introduction to E-Governance. Organisational Flexibility and Competitiveness.