Content of review 1, reviewed on June 01, 2021

Comments on abstract, title, references

ABSTRACT: Though, I have read a lot about the subject and have good information about it, but I have not done any research about that. It matches with the main article. * The aim is clear and the methodology is outlined. * Result and conclusion: They are aligned with each other. TITLE: * It contains the key features. * It is an important subject, but not interesting. * It is accurate representation. REFERENCES: * The references are relevant. * The refrences are current. * If they are cited at the very end of paper is better.

Comments on introduction/background

It does not contain several refrences and is a rapid 3-weeks research that is not a strong background. It is somehow relevant to the WHO guidelines. The study population is not big but their data is complete.

Comments on methodology

  1. The process of subject selection is clear.
  2. Variable measurments are not clear. They have used external data. 3.The method is not relaiable because 2 authors did not reach to the same result and had to have a third author.
  3. There is not enough detail.

Comments on data and results

The tables and figures are presented appropriately.They are relevant and clearaly presented.

● Appropriate units, rounding, and number of decimals? yes ● Titles, columns, and rows labelled correctly and clearly? yes ● Categories grouped appropriately? yes ● Does the text in the results add to the data or is it repetitive? yes ● Are you clear about what is a statistically significant result? yes ● Are you clear about what is a practically meaningful result? yes

Comments on discussion and conclusions

● Are the results discussed from multiple angles and placed into context without being overinterpreted? No, after discussion there was a third author needed because of disagrrement between the two others.

● Do the conclusions answer the aims of the study? yes

● Are the conclusions supported by references or results? no ● Are the limitations of the study fatal or are they opportunities to inform future research? they are not fatal

Source

    © 2021 the Reviewer.

References

    Valerie, S., Declan, D., Alistair, N., David, R. 2020. Care bundles for improving outcomes in patients with COVID-19 or related conditions in intensive care - a rapid scoping review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.