Content of review 1, reviewed on June 01, 2021

Comments on abstract, title, references

Comments on abstract, title, references Title: Can be refined as the titke is too long and also patient safety culture is repeated. Abstract: The aim is not defined well. What was the sample selection criteria used. In conclusion the statemnet that patient safety culture presented weakness , was it determined only by takig that event reporting was low. References: Most of the references are not recent references.

Comments on introduction/background

Details in the introduction doesnot provide most recent and relevant literature and also the problem is not signified

Comments on methodology

Methodolody was well explained but how the sample size was derived need to be explained , whether using a definite formula or any other relevant source

Comments on data and results

Results was explained very briefly. Need more elaboration on the factors which was not significant for patient safety culture

Comments on discussion and conclusions

Discussion wss hood according to the results obtained and conclustion was brief. Could have reason it out why patient safety culture was fragile in Brazil according to this study

Source

    © 2021 the Reviewer.

References

    Hiromi, H. O. J., Freire, G. T., Lonardoni, C. M. T., Tolentino, S. M. 2019. Health professionals' perception of patient safety culture in a university hospital in Sao Paulo: A cross-sectional study applying the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Sao Paulo Medical Journal.