Reviewed on February , 2021
Source
© 2021 the Reviewer.
Content of review 2, reviewed on July 26, 2021
General Comments:
1.In order to understand the state-of-the-art in this field in a better way, the most relevant background information should be provided, and the most relevant literature should be cited. Especially, in order to give the readers a sense of continuity, a literature check of the papers published in this in recent years is preferred, and the content of relevant papers should be related to the results and findings presented in your publication.
2.Please clarify the equations in detail.
3.The legibility of the figures should be improved.
4.Please check the format of the reference.
5.Some sentences with long descriptions are difficult to be read and understood. Some typographical and grammatical errors of this manuscript should be carefully checked and corrected.
Major Comments:
1.Abstract should effectively provide a clear picture for the whole contribution of the manuscript and it should be revised.
2.The description of the equations in this manuscript is not clear. That is, the definition of symbols and abbreviations in equations is not clear enough. Please revise and define it.
3.Please clarify the system operating conditions in more detail.
4.Please clarify the structure and parameters of the proposed method.
5.Please clarify the differences between the calculated solutions obtained by the proposed method and other existing methods.
Source
© 2021 the Reviewer.
Content of review 3, reviewed on September 28, 2021
i have no further comments.
Source
© 2021 the Reviewer.