Content of review 1, reviewed on December 10, 2021

Dear Author(s), I am pleased to read the revised version of your manuscript. However, I have a few concerns: I can see many changes as per the suggestions, but without citing the papers from where these changes have been incorporated is not ethical at all. I suggest updating citations suggested earlier. My concern from methods section is again the same, how the sample was selected? Here are few recent articles where the author talked about positive leadership and its importance: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2021-0109https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0470https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1637https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2020-0036 Here are the latest papers for well-being: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-10-2020-0088https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-05-2021-0113 This paper would help you justify sample size: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2019-1069

Finally, the Implications of the study are still weak. Elaborate more. It would be great to separate theoretical and practical implications.

Source

    © 2021 the Reviewer.

Content of review 2, reviewed on February 07, 2022

Dear Author,

I am glad to read the revised version of this manuscript, I have no further comments.

Regards,

Source

    © 2022 the Reviewer.

References

    Kamran, I., Muhammad, N., Abdul, S. Q., Tehreem, F., T., A. S. 2022. When Self-Sacrificial Leaders Induce Employees' Citizenship Behaviors? Uncovering the Nexus of Psychological Empowerment and Psychological Well-Being. SAGE Open.