Content of review 1, reviewed on May 07, 2020
Strengths
The findings of this study are crucial to further enhance the understanding of different monitoring strategies to manage an optimal training load in strength training programming.
The limitations of the study are opportunities to inform future research, practitioners are advised to incorporate multiple markers to assess recovery needs to manage strength training programming. Authors mentioned that future studies should replicate these findings using larger sample sizes, possibly including subjects with different training backgrounds.
Weaknesses
Minor points
Some references are not recent such as 6, 15, 24, 25, 26,and 28.
In section 2.3. Procedures, 2.3.1. Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability; please cite references regarding the reliability of Firstbeat Bodyguard 2 (Firstbeat Technologies, Jyväskylä, Finland).
In discussion section; it will be more actual meaning through particular examples of presented results.
Source
© 2020 the Reviewer.
References
Antonia, T., Nils, F., Pedro, F., Kenji, D., Christoph, R., Wilhelm, B., Moritz, S. 2019. Can Heart Rate Variability Determine Recovery Following Distinct Strength Loadings? A Randomized Cross-Over Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.