This is an interesting study and the authors have collected a unique dataset using cutting edge methodology, literature reviews. - The paper is generally well written and structured.

• However, in my opinion the paper has some shortcomings in regards to some data analyses and text, and I feel this unique dataset has not been utilized to its full extent

-I have provided some remarks on the text as it is often vague and long-winded, highlighted remarks inside article provided.

-it needs alphabetical review, adjust fonts, spaces, paragraphs, do all same font with same design

-adjust abstract as in form of introduction, methods, result, conclusion.

-remove all graphs, tables, legends or figures from inside article and put all after references at end of article

-review all references and adjust font, design for all references -review discussion paragraph as a whole

-the research Is relevant and interesting

-the paper is well written, the text is clear and easy to read but needs some font, design and alphabetical review with corrections -the conclusion is consistent with the evidence and arguments presented - Maximum 1000 words allowed per search

Abstract, title and references ● Is the aim clear? yes ● Is it clear what the study found and how they did it? yes it is clear to get objects aims, goals ● Is the title informative and relevant? yes ● Are the references: yes Relevant, little Recent, Referenced correctly, Appropriate key studies included

Introduction/background ● Is it clear what is already known about this topic? yes clear ● Is the research question clearly outlined? yes ● Is the research question justified given what is already known about the topic? justified

Overall ● Was the study design appropriate to answer the aim? yes ● What did this study add to what was already known on this topic? added new topics updates ● Is the article consistent within itself? yes

Overall strengths of the article and what impact it might have in your field; good research, overall grading 7-8/10