Tweet Review
Content of review 1, reviewed on January 15, 2021
Congratulations to all the participants for this important material. Next, my suggestions are presented.
Line 296: Figure 3 is not mentioned during the text and one option is to include a reference here.
Line 322: reference problem.
Line 370: Figure 5 is not mentioned during the text and one option is to include a reference here.
Line 563: shouldn't the legend be "industry" instead of "energy"?
Line 683: shouldn't the legend be "building" instead of "energy"?
Line 801: shouldn't the legend be "transport" instead of "energy"?
Line 890: maybe you could invert: "deforestation (including clearing of natural vegetation for agricultural purposes)" because this conversion is one form of deforestation.
Line 957: Accordingly to the map of 2016 developed under the 4th Brazilian Inventory of greenhouse gases emissions, 9% (80.288.327 ha of 874.100.912 ha) of the land were used for agricultural and silviculture. More information: https://sirene.mctic.gov.br/portal/export/sites/sirene/backend/galeria/arquivos/2020/12/2020_12_22_4CN_v5_Ingles.pdf and https://sirene.mctic.gov.br/portal/opencms/textoGeral/2018/10/11/RR_do_Inventario_Brasileiro_de_Emissoes_e_Remocoes_Antropicas_de_GEE.html (LULUCF reference report)
Line 1009: consider rewriting "without this sector"; perhaps including "efforts on mitigation actions related to this sector".
Source
© 2021 the Reviewer.
References
F., L. W., Thomas, W., Julia, P., Robbie, A., Monica, C., J., O. J. G., Dominik, W., Giulio, M., Al, K. A., Jo, H., Shonali, P., Maria, F., Yamina, S., Raphael, S., Klaus, H., Laixiang, S., Kahn, R. S., Smail, K., Stephane, d. l. R. d. C., Lazarus, C., J., D. S., Igor, B., Hancheng, D., Shobhakar, D., Xianchun, T., Yong, G., Baihe, G., Jan, M. 2021. A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environmental Research Letters.
