The published paper lacks some fundamental structure.

The title is not focused and not clear. The abstract has grammatical mistakes and there is no clear aim, analysis process. No implication, significance, or future direction was mentioned.

There is no unity or connection While the research question is outlined, their aim is not clearly defined. Further, the research question is not justified. The literature review is outdated and there is limited synthesis there

The process of subject selection is not clear. No demographical data were described There were no variables defined and measured appropriately The instrument is valid (adapt) There is no enough detail in order to replicate the study

The data presented in an appropriate way. Tables and figures relevant and clearly presented. Titles, columns, and rows are labeled correctly and clearly Categories are not grouped appropriately The text in the results somehow add to the data or is it repetitive Not clear about what is a statistically significant result Not clear about what is a practically meaningful result

The results are discussed from multiple angles and placed into context without being overinterpreted The conclusions answer the aims of the study. The conclusions supported by references or results No limitations are mentioned Minimum opportunities to inform future research The study design appropriate to answer the aim. This study adds somehow to what was already known on this topic There were no major flaws of this article The article is not consistent within itself