Comments on abstract, title, references

## Abstract
The authors mention the purpose of the research. The abstract clearly states the purpose and method of analysis. There was the use of passive voice and monotonicity in the last part of the abstract. It may be addressed to improve the readability of the document.

Title

             The title suits the overall study and procedure. It can state the research work correctly.

References

            References are cited correctly. Some recent journals can also be referenced to get the latest insight into the field.

Comments on the introduction

The fundamental introduction about classification problem in Machine Learning explained well.

The need for the method used, problems with previous methodologies are also appropriately described.

There were some grammatical mistakes like incorrect use of 'the' article and helping verbs.

Comments on methodology

1. The methodology used is stated appropriately.
2. The dataset taken is a standard one which can be used to produce reproducible results. The structure for the same is also defined.

Comments on data and results

1. The dataset used is standard and valid.
2. The text on top of pictures is a little blurred. I request the author to please use a better quality image if possible.
3. Also, it was mentioned that all the cropped classifications were correct, but the telescope was classified chair so the author should correct for the same.

Comments on discussion and conclusions

The author states that the cropped images are correctly classified. But should mention that most of the results were classified correctly rather than all the classifications as correct.

Also, the text in the text in some images are not readable. If the possible author should use better quality images, or mention the cropped images using labels under them.

Final Edit Suggestions:

There were wrong uses of the article at multiple places, like using 'the deep learning' which should be Deep Learning only. There was some improper use of prepositions too. So, I request the author to go through the grammar part once again.

Also, the author should provide more discussion on the topic to attract more users and provide a better reading experience to the readers as well as researchers.