1. Originality: Does the paper contain new and significant information adequate to justify publication? yes, their findings show that non-visual learners and non-auditory learners are not impacted equally in a partition room. this has policy implication. The authors can further state the theoretical implication of this findings

2. Relationship to Literature: Does the paper demonstrate an adequate understanding of the relevant literature in the field and cite an appropriate range of literature sources? Is any significant work ignored? The author(s) indicate that there are few result in in the literature that study the learners of particular group, namely Saudi Arabia. line 33 to 36 page 1. I suggest that the authors include these works in their literature review. To show how they position their work to earlier studies. for example R. Baki, “Gender-segregated education in Saudi Arabia:Its impact on social norms and the Saudi labor market,”Educ. Policy Anal. Arch., vol. 12, no. 28, pp. 1–12, 2004. can be captured under the literature review.

3. Methodology: Is the paper's argument built on an appropriate base of theory, concepts, or other ideas? Has the research or equivalent intellectual work on which the paper is based been well designed? Are the methods employed appropriate? ok

4. Results: Are results presented clearly and analysed appropriately? Do the conclusions adequately tie together the other elements of the paper?

ok

1. Practicality and/or Research implications: Does the paper identify clearly any implications for practice and/or further research? Are these implications consistent with the findings and conclusions of the paper? ok

2. Quality of Communication: Does the paper clearly express its case, measured against the technical language of the field and the expected knowledge of the journal's readership? Has attention been paid to the clarity of expression and readability, such as sentence structure, jargon use, acronyms, etc. ok line 46 page 1 affect students' teaching experince (I suspect is students' learning experience)

Recommendation Minor Revision

Would you be willing to review a revision of this manuscript? Yes