Content of review 1, reviewed on August 21, 2020
Comments on abstract, title, references
The aim of the research is clearly mentioned. Title can be more specific References look relevant
Comments on introduction/background
Adequate literature review is done to to understand the research..
Comments on methodology
The author is clear about the subject selection for carrying out the experiment. Author is appreciated for comparing the classification accuracy for different data sets with different features
Comments on data and results
Tables and figures are clearly presented The results are well presented and statistically justified
Comments on discussion and conclusions
Author well presented the visual words approach to medical image categorization. Conclusion is well supported with relevant references. The work presented can be well taken up for further research
Source
© 2020 the Reviewer.
References
Jussi, K., Julio, G. 2010. Interactive Image Retrieval. Imageclef: Experimental Evaluation in Visual Information Retrieval.