Comments In the conclusion of the abstract, I noticed that "MRD" has been used, which I believe should be corrected to "MRF." Kindly correct it. The introduction is well-written, highlighting the limitations of conventional MRI and the advantages of Quantitative MRI. It provides a solid foundation for the study and conveys the significance of the topic. The study follows the well-established PRISMA guidelines, which enhances its methodological clarity. In Table 1 (Page 4), you have mentioned that the total number of studies is 252, including those from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. However, in Figure 1 (Page 6), the total number of studies identified is listed as 256 including Database 4, if so, which Databases? Please clarify. On Page 5, under the "Study Selection" section (2nd line), please mention that 5 studies were removed for other reasons, as indicated in the flowchart (Figure 1). The rest of the Results, Discussion, and Conclusion sections are well-written. They provide a clear and comprehensive interpretation of the findings and study outcomes.