Content of review 1, reviewed on January 08, 2021

Comments on

abstract concise and perfect , title, good references perfect format

Comments on introduction/background

introduction/background: The introduction part is superficial. The entire introduction is filled with grammatical errors.

The research problem is not formulated properly and justified.

Comments on methodology

Methods: Inclusion criteria should be more specific. The technique of pranayama breathing should be explained in detail. Mention the name of the device used for PFT. Sample size: How come the effect size is calculated?

Comments on data and results

Results: p=0.000 should be mentioned like p˂0.001 Mention the statistical value of all the muscles (RMS) The reports of quality of analysis – not clear.

Comments on discussion and conclusions

Discussion: The difference in mechanism between pranayama and conventional breathing is not discussed in more details . Final Comments: This is a good revision of an interesting paper

Source

    © 2021 the Reviewer.

References

    Gopal, N., Kamal, A. W., A., E. A., H., E. H., M., A. A., K., S. A., S., H. R. 2021. Yoga in Burn: Role of pranayama breathing exercise on pulmonary function, respiratory muscle activity and exercise tolerance in full-thickness circumferential burns of the chest. Burns.