Your expertise

I have previously published research dissertation on neurodegenerative disorders & reviewed many relevant manuscripts.

Review body

a. The title of the manuscript must be moderated. The present one is only referring to the essence of the article, however, an ideal title should provide the following information; 1. The question, 2. Outcome, & 3. Methodology. b. All of the grammatical issues require to be corrected. Example: Requires- Require (Abstract) etc. c. The abstract seems too brief in nature (Only 195 words), please try to develop it in an explanatory fashion. d. The gist of the study should be given within the first three sentences of the abstract e. The aim of the article is quite clear; still, there is a lack of sentences regarding the significance of the study. f. All of the words must be evenly distributed under the margin among all over the manuscript g. There is a lack of informations regarding the ethical approval & author consent in the manuscript h. Also, it's better to develop a table fully defining each of the acronyms i. The introduction seems relatively unclear. j. Greater Less number of research questions being outlined, however, only the rationale being given but lack of justification behind the already known about the topic. k. The result & discussion segment is well written & represented l. The methodology is still an ambiguous term. m. The study method is valid and as it is a hypothesis so it requires greater reliability. n. Sorry to inform you the details are smaller in size and lack of much important information’s o. The results aren’t being proposed from multiple angles. p. The conclusion gives an honest idea. q. There are further opportunities to inform future research r. The conclusion has informed about various topics and worked from different parts so we can say it is consistent

Overall categorization

• Incremental. As best as you can assess, this paper validates or summaries other research to-date and does not promise any substantial breakthrough/s in research.