About the title: 1. if the title were a question form phrase, it would be better. 2. Also, if it had not been used abbreviations, it would be better.

About the Abstract: 3.In this section, any background has not been stated. (weakness point)

About the References: 4.according to the discussion of the article that should be expanded, References should be extended, too.

Comments on introduction/background

1. This introduction is not specified the number and components of the continuation of the article. (weakness point)

Comments on methodology

6.Each step has been stated well and in order, and the selection process has been stated.

Comments on data and results

7.The results have been presented separately and accurately, and in detail, along with the diagrams of the range of alterations of obtained variables from the methods of measurement.

Comments on discussion and conclusions

About the discussion: 8. The discussion has not been done well and in detail, and it is poor overall.it should be expanded more. so, the number of references should be extended. (weakness point)

About the conclusions: 9. The significance of this subject has not been stated. (weakness point) 10. There is no mention of the investigations that can be done around this subject in the future. (weakness point)