Comments on abstract, title, references

Abstract: It seems to be clear. The study aimed to estimate the incidence of MRSA in ICU during seven years via a review study by five electronic databases.

Title: Is relevant, mentioning to the place of the study may be necessary.

References: are recent and referenced correctly. But there is a need to be more.

Comments on introduction/background

Introduction: - The study focused on the topic clearly and in short. - The research question is clear. - " There are limited data available regarding the prevalence of MRSA infections among burn patients in the recent years " . This statement must be reviewed.

Comments on methodology

Methodology: - The study design is clear, since all the targeted samples were defined. - The method is easy to understand because it depends on electronic databases.

Comments on data and results

Results: - The date represented primarily in simple and short. - Table 2 and figure 2 are to large. - other results are clear, more focusing is needed to results statistics.

Comments on discussion and conclusions

Conclusions: - The review results were discussed in reliable way. - the interpretation was convenient with suitable references.

Conclusions: - they were results supported. No need to refer to the exact results in conclusions ( numbers and percentages).