The idea is appreciable. The manuscript is also written in a well-mannered way. Hence, it should be considered. The following comments should be incorporated in the revised version of the manuscript.

1. Abstract requires improvements in view of existing problem and its solution adopting new methodology.
2. The motivation for the suggested method should be better explained and clarified.
3. Introduction section should be enhanced.
4. The novelty and contribution of the work needs to be more carefully laid out, in particular with respect to previous publications in the area.
5. Grammatical and typo errors should be removed. Improvement in language is required.
6. The literature review requires improvement. The following latest references may be reviewed: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2019.11.025;
   https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4767; https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4493;
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.02.034; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.038.
   https://doi.org/10.4018/ijeoe.2012040105
   https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.11.071, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5018338
7. System parameters with source should be given.
8. Rating of the system should be provided.
9. Results should also be compared with the existing literature.
10. Conclusions should be given in points.
11. Section 3.2 should be elaborated. In FOPID. What’s is value of frequency range and order of filter?
12. A separate block diagram of multi-control adaptive FOPID controller should be given.

The comments have been replied successfully. The paper can be accepted now.

The paper may be accepted.