Content of review 1, reviewed on January 27, 2020

The study title and aim are clear, but the information in the abstract is Needs more customization clarification. references are strong, related to the study topic and are modern After checking the dates of the references and the date of the study was published and merged within the context correctly.
introduction is clear about this topic, but the research question not specified. The process of subject selection is clear, but the variables not defined and measured appropriately, also the study methods unclear, and they're not enough reasons shown to prepare the study. The data in the study presented in an appropriate format, also tables figures, titles, columns, rows labeled, and the categories organized correctly, but the study did not show statistical methods for calculating percentages and number of decimals. finally, we can say the results are practical and meaningful. The results discussed from multiple angles and placed into context without being over-interpreted, and answered the aims of the study, also supported by references, but not refer to challenges and opportunities in the future.

Source

    © 2020 the Reviewer.