Review badges
0 pre-pub reviews
0 post-pub reviews
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The urine dipstick is widely used as an initial screening tool for the evaluation of proteinuria; however, its diagnostic accuracy has not yet been sufficiently evaluated. Therefore, we evaluated its diagnostic accuracy using spot urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) and total protein/creatinine ratio (PCR) in proteinuria.METHODS: Using PCR ≥0.2g/g or ≥0.5g/g and ACR ≥300mg/g or ≥30mg/g as the reference standard, we calculated the diagnostic accuracy profile: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.RESULTS: PCR and ACR were available for 10,348 and 3,873 instances of dipstick testing. The proportions with PCR ≥0.2g/g, ≥0.5g/g and ACR ≥300mg/g, ≥30mg/g were 38.2%, 24.6% and 8.9%, 31.7%, respectively. The AUCs for PCR ≥0.2g/g, ≥0.5g/g, and ACR ≥300mg/g were 0.935 (trace: closest to ideal point), 0.968 (1+), and 0.983 (1+), respectively. Both sensitivity and specificity were >80% except for PCR ≥0.5g/g with trace cutoff. For the reference standard of ACR ≥30mg/g, the AUC was 0.797 (trace) and the sensitivity was 63.5%.CONCLUSION: Urine dipstick test can be used for screening in older outpatients with ACR ≥300mg/g or PCR as the reference standard for proteinuria. However, we cannot recommend the test as a screening tool with ACR ≥30mg/g as the reference owing to its low sensitivity.

Authors

Lim, Dongmin;  Lee, Dong-Young;  Cho, Soung Ha;  Kim, One Zoong;  Cho, Sang Woo;  An, Su Kyoung;  Kim, Hwe Won;  Moon, Kyoung Hyoub;  Lee, Myung Hee;  Kim, Beom

Publons users who've claimed - I am an author

No Publons users have claimed this paper.