Review badges
1 pre-pub reviews
1 post-pub reviews
  • Publication date: April 2, 2019

    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2582125

    Archeology

    THE SPREAD OF ZEBU CATTLE FROM SOUTH ASIA TO THE EAST MEDITERRANEAN REGION AS A MARKER OF INDO-EUROPEAN POPULATION DISPERSAL

    Semenenko, Aleksandr Andreyevich1 1Candidate of Historical Sciences, Teacher, Gymnasia № 2, 72, Generala Lizukova street, Voronezh, Russia, E-mail: 31071976@bk.ru

    Abstract: The paper develops the hypothesis that zebu cattle (depictions) are a marker of Indo-European population dispersal from the Indus Valley to Syria and Anatolia in 7000–1000 BC. It combines the exploration of the data on human genetics (full genomes and Y-Haplogroups originating from South Asia), bovine genetic admixture distribution maps (mitochondrial, autosomal and Y-chromosomal), archaeology (findings of zebu figurines, pictures, images and seals) and Indo-European linguistics.

    Keywords: zebu cattle, Indo-Europeans, Indo-Aryans, Iranians, Anatolians, Mitanni and Kassite Aryans.

    I. INTRODUCTION Zebu cattle endemic in South Asia were domesticated in the Indus valley around 7000 BC. Zebu bulls played an important role in the religion and mythology of Indo-Aryans native to Hindustan since the composition of Rigveda where they are mentioned in an exclusive connection with Indo-Aryan Devas (‘Playing-in-Light’) in all main chronological layers of the text (I.46.3; I.121.4; I.181.5; I.184.3; IV.44.2; V.73.7; V.75.4; VIII.20.21; X.8.2; X.102.7). The spread of zebu cattle (depictions) from India through Afghanistan, southern Central Asia and modern day Iran to the East Mediterranean region including Syria, Anatolia, Cyprus and Palestine correlates well with the present geographical distribution of human Y- haplogroups L-M11, R2 (R-L266) and R1a-Z93 originating from Hindustan and of South Asian human genome K5 and South Indian human genome K16 (see the maps published by Dr. O. Balanovsky on the website Генофонд.рф) (Photographic Applications, Plate 1). Both sets of data correlate well with the bovine genetic admixture distribution maps of the present day Near East published by C.J. Edwards et. al. (Photographic Applications, Plate 2). These territories are or used to be populated by Indo-European speaking people (from the East to the West respectively Indo-Aryans, Iranians, extinct Kassite and Mitanni Aryans and Anatolians). II. METHODOLOGY The paper develops the hypothesis that zebu cattle (depictions) are a marker of Indo-European dispersal from the Indus valley to Syria and Anatolia. The study combines the exploration of the data on human genetics (full genomes and Y-haplogroups), bovine genetics (mitochondrial, autosomal and Y-chromosomal), archaeology and Indo-European linguistics. Thus the article has an interdisciplinary character.

    III. DISCUSSION The limitations of the text have not let the author consider the data on zebu cattle (depictions) from Iraq and Egypt. The introduction of the humped bull to Sumer is in the opinion of the author to be explained by the trade with the Indus Valley (Meluhha) and the discovery of Indo-Aryan terms in Sumerian language (around 3000–2000 BC) by Igor Tonoyan-Belyayev (Saint Petersburg).

    IV. RESULTS Let us consider the evidence of migration along the southern route. In 3200–1800 BC in the Helmand valley (Afghanistan) there was an archaeological culture strongly associated with Baluchistan and the Indus valley. Its main centres were Shahr-i Sokhte I–IV (Sistan, Iran) in the delta of the river and Mundigak III–IV (Kandahar, Afghanistan) in the upper reaches of the river. Both were places of production of clay figurines of humpback bulls. The number of finds of zebu statuettes from Shahr-i Sokhte is about 690 (Photographic Applications, Plate 3). They are made mostly of clay (only 4% are from terracotta), a quarter has decorations, some are painted red or black (Figure 1), many have eyes and genitals depicted by the moldings or notches, some have a sign molded (Figure 2) or drawn (Figure 3) on the forehead.

                 Figure 1                                                  Figure 2                                                    Figure 3
    

    A similar decoration can be seen on the heads of bull figurines from Q8 site of the Quetta valley in Baluchistan from the layers of Damb Sadaat III culture (Figure 4). There are decorations in the form of nail notches throughout the body on Shahr-i Sokhte figurines (Figure 5), some statuettes have a hole in the lower abdomen for connection to a clay wagon with wheels solid or with painted spokes (Figure 6).

                   Figure 4      
                                                                                                                                         Figure 5
    
                                                                           Figure 6
    

    The hump of zebu of Shahr-i Sokhte figurines is often hypertrophied. Also two seal impressions with images of zebu were found there. Clay figurines of zebu are hardly placed in graves, only one bronze statuette of zebu was found in Burial 16. Figurines of zebu were made far from the central workshops, on some there are traces of completion already after production, others are flattened or deformed while being still not hardened as if during distant transportation, some were perforated even before hardening, there are some cuts and traces of erasure still in a soft state on many of the statuettes. All this, according to G. Santini, points at the fact that the making of these clay figurines was not intended to provide the final product, but was a reflection of some symbolic or ritual action performed in the process of modeling or immediately after it — which indicates the existence of the cult of zebu. There was a series of successive settlements in the region to the West of Shahr-i Sokhte on the border between Western and Eastern Iran, on the mountain plain on the western edge of the Dasht-e Lut (the Lut Desert) near the city of Shahdad (Kerman) in 4000–1500 BC. Of them the one dating back to 2500–2000 BCE was a major handicraft and trading centre of this area. The acquaintance of their inhabitants with zebu is evidenced by a chlorite vessel with a carved image of this animal (2900–2600 BC) (Figure 7).

                      Figure 7                                                                                   Figure 8
    

    A bronze flag plate was also found there (circa 2400 BC). A zebu between two predators was embossed in the lower part of it (Figure 8). A stone vessel with zebus with relief protruding snouts carved on it (Figure 9) and a seal with images of two humped bulls (Figure 10) come from Kerman. A copper plate with a lying zebu embossed on it dating back to 2500–2000 BC originates from Shahdad (Figure 11).

        Figure 9                                Figure 10                                 Figure 11                                           Figure 12
    

    The major centre of chlorite items’ production was Jiroft culture (Kerman). Its large settlement Konar Sandal existed in 2880–2200 BC in the valley of Halil Rud South of Shahdad and 28 km South of Jiroft. There are numerous vessels and a number of other chlorite objects from this area decorated with traced carvings with inlays of (semiprecious) stones and shells. Very often they are images of humpback bulls and cows (Photographic Applications, Plate 4). Until 2000, when the Halil Rud flood uncovered sites with a large number of chlorite artifacts, such things had been designated as objects of "intercultural style", because they had been found in different regions of Southwest and Central Asia — for example, vessels with carvings of two zebus from Tarut island off the North-Eastern coast of Arabia in the Persian Gulf (the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2014.717) (Figure 12) and from Agrab (or Aqrab) in the Diyala valley near Baghdad (Figure 13). Also a plate fragment of chlorite comes from the same Tell Agrab (Figure 14). According to Ph.L. Kohl’s map, chlorite objects with carved images of zebu on them were also found in Mari, Khafajah or Khafaje, Kish, Nippur, Adab or Udab, Ur in Mesopotamia, and at Susa in Elam, on the island of Failaka in the Persian Gulf and at Tepe Yahya in Kerman to the West of the Halil Rud.

                 Figure 13                          Figure 14                                 Figure 15                           Figure 16
    

    D. Frenez and M. Vidale described a unique chlorite plate on which the image of a humpback cow with a calf at the udder and a predator on its back is carved — and in front of it there is a large cup (Figure 15). According to the researchers, the whole composition is a remake of the famous Mature Harappan pattern with a unicorn bull at the drinker. The same authors analyzed a cylinder seal of marble greatly worn-out by stamping with images of bulls’ heads found at South Konar Sandal. It has carvings of a unicorn with a hump and a head of a zebu with two horns (Figure 16). The scholars are of the opinion that this Jiroft seal carver repeats the patterns of Mature Harappan seals, including creatures with three and more heads. During the excavations of South Konar Sandal a damaged cup with a zebu drawing was found (Figure 17). A small figurine of zebu from lapis lazuli comes from the region of Halil Rud (Figure 18). Moreover, there is a chlorite vessel, now exhibited in the Archaeological Museum of Jiroft, which has carvings of a bull with a hump and only one horn (Figure 19). All this points at the strong relationship between the Indus cultures and Jiroft and the powerful influence of the former on the civilization of the latter.

                 Figure 17                                   Figure 18                                        Figure 19
    

    Let us consider the evidence of migration along the Northern route through the territory of the Bactrian–Margian archaeological culture (2300–1600 BC). It yields a number of zebu images: on the damaged chlorite seal from Togolok 21 (boundary of III–II Millennia BC) (Figure 20), on one side of the two-sided stone seal from the old delta of Murgab (Figure 21), on the Bactrian–Margian seals with images of a zebu and snakes (figure 22), a statuette of zebu found on the surface of Gonur I site.

          Figure 20                           Figure 21                                                           Figure 22
    

    At Gonur Depe three clay figurines of humped bovines (trench 18, Room 161; the top layer of the trenches 17 and 22) were found also (Figure 23). Zebu is depicted on the seal from the settlement of Taip 1 (Figure 24). A stick figure from the cult vessel in the shape of a zebu was excavated from one of the looted graves of Bactria (Figure 25). A similar statuette was found at Togolok 21 site (Figure 26). The close cultural and population relations of the Indus valley with the South of Central Asia are well known.

                Figure 23
    
                   Figure 24                                     Figure 25                                              Figure 26
    

    Bactria–Margiana, Gorgan, Sumbar, Tepe Sialk, Hissar III, Shahdad, Jiroft, Tepe Yahya to the South-West of Halil Rud, Baluchistan and Makran should be included in the formative area of the ancient Iranian ethnos, into which native speakers of Indo-Aryan languages autochthonous in the North-West Hindustan constantly poured from the Indus valley. The collapse of the civilization of Mature Harappa circa 2000–1900 BC caused the new wave of migration of some of its carriers — warriors and zebu breeders — to the West up to Syria and Anatolia. Numerous images of humpback bulls — endemics of South Asia — dating back to the first half of the II Millennium BC and later were found during excavations of archaeological sites of the (North-)Eastern Mediterranean. A clay form for baking bread from the palace in Mari on the Euphrates with an image of a lion attacking zebu stored in the Louvre (AO18902) (Figure 27) dates back to the beginning of the II Millennium BC. A hematite cylinder seal from Syria depicting a humped bull held in the Louvre (AO3757) (Figure 28) dates back to the XVIII century BC. The palace of the king of the state of Mari Zimri-lim (1775–1761 BC) was decorated with mirror frescoes of two humpback bulls (the Louvre, AO19826) (Figure 29).

           Figure 27                                      Figure 28                                                     Figure 29
    

    There is an image of two lions standing with their front paws on a zebu bull on the hematite cylindrical seal from the Louvre (AO10855), dating back to the XVII century BC (Figure 30). A clay figurine of a zebu (circa 1700 BC) held in the British Museum (125500) was discovered in Chagar Bazar (Syria) (Figure 31). Sixteen more fragmented statuettes of zebus were excavated at the same site. A clay figurine of a humped bull was found in Umm el-Marra (northern Syria) (Figure 32). A clay statuette of a zebu bull from Tepe Gawra (24 km northeast of Mosul, Iraq) dates back to 1500 BC or a little earlier (Figure 33). Late Bronze Age deposits at Tell Munbaqa in north Syria yielded many clay zebu figurines (Figure 34).

    Figure 30 Figure 31 Figure 32 Figure 33 Figure 34

                                                                              Figure 35
    

    Five zebu figurines (Figure 35) were excavated at Tell Brak site (north-eastern Syria). A seal with an image of two lions attacking a bull–zebu (Figure 36) comes from the temple of Ishtar–Shavushki in Nuzi (Yorghan Tepe, Iraq, near the Tigris river). The discovery of the sealing with the inscription ‘Shaushtatar, son of Parshatatar, the king of Mitanni’ (circa 1440 BC) is extremely important. It was also used later by at least four generations of kings of this state with Indo-Aryan names. The impressions of this seal were found on tablets with the texts mentioning the ruler and his donations of villages in the region from the eastern bank of the Tigris to the western bank of the Euphrates in the settlements of Nuzi, Umm el-Marra, Tell Brak and Tell Bazi (northern Syria). This seal depicts the slaughter of a one-horned zebu in the upper corner (Figure 37). Thus it combines two images of Rigveda and Mature Harappa in a socially, politically and ritually significant context — that of a unicorn and that of a zebu. According to R. Matthews zebu figurines dating back to 2000–1000 BC were also found at Alalakh (in the Amuq River valley of Turkey's Hatay Province), Sabi Abyadh (northern Syria), Tall Hamad Aga (north Iraq) and Haradum (on the middle Euphrates). What is even more important, at Tell Hamida, in the Iraqi Jezirah, among the animal figurines there were twice as many zebu as other species in the Late Khabur – early Nuzi Ware (i.e. Mitannian) Period (1650–1550 BC).

             Figure 36                         Figure 37             Figure 38                      Figure 39                         Figure 40
    

    A bronze statuette of a zebu from Tel Hazor (Israel, now in the Israel Museum, Jerusalem) (Figure 38) dates back to 1500–1200 BC. A hollow bronze figurine of a zebu from Tel Beth-Shemesh (Israel) (Figure 39) dates back to 1400–1200 BC. The Louvre houses a number of clay statuettes of zebu from Emar (Tell Meskene, Aleppo Governate, northern Syria), dating back to 1300–1200 BC (AO26865, AO26867) and 1300–1150 BC (AO26838, AO26864, AO26868, AO26870, AO26899). A clay figurine of a humped bull from Cyprus (Sinda necropolis, the Louvre, AM1631) dates back to 1230–1050 BC (Photographic Applications, Plate 5). A bronze statuette of a zebu from Dhahrat et-Tawileh (Palestine) (Figure 40) dates back to the XII century BC. A relief of the temple of Ramesses III (1186–1155 BC) in Medinet Habu depicts four carts of the Sea Peoples invading Egypt drawn by humpback bulls (Figure 41).

    Figure 41 Images of zebu were common in the same era in the Hittite kingdom. A relief vase from Hüseyindede (Yörüklü in the Turkish province of Çorum) with a painted decoration in the form of four humpback bulls (Figure 42) belongs to the Old Hittite period (XVI century BC). Also two early Hittite seals were found — an attacking zebu bull can be seen on the top of the first and a pair of opposing humped bulls is placed at the bottom of the second (Figures 43).

     Figure 42           Figure 43                    Figure 44                                            Figure 45
    

    Hittite silver drinking vessel (rhyton) in the form of the front half of the body of a humpback bull kneeling on its front legs dates back to 1400–1200 BC (the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1989.281.11) (Figure 44). A large terracotta figurine of a zebu bull with small holes on the chest, the front and the back of the neck was found in Bogazköy and dates back to 1400–1200 BC. It is now stored in Berlin in the Museum of southwestern Asia. There is a humped bull on the royal seals of Muwatalli II (c. 1295–1272 BC) (Figure 45). The joint seals of Muwattalli II and Tanuhepa also depict a humped bull (Figure 46). The figure of the bull is a hieroglyph and a part of the name of Muwatalli (syllabogram "mu"), but it is important that the king preferred to use the image of the zebu bull to write his name. In some Hittite images, the humpback bull represents the god of the storm. In the name of Muwatalli II, the image of the bull also functions as a symbol of the god of the storm - the personal patron of the ruler, whose power is manifested in the power of the king. Signs on the figure of the bull on the seals of Muwatalli II are found only on the images of the bull, calf and deer — i.e. animals–representatives of the god of the storm and the god of the fields — which emphasizes the sacred character of the humped bull on the seals.

    Figure 46 A bronze rod with an image of a humpback bull at the end (end of II Millennium BC) comes from Northern Iran, a clay zebu figurine (Figure 47) — from Haft Tepe (Elam), two clay statuettes of lying zebus dating from the reign of Untash-Napirisha (XIV century BC) (Figure 48) — from Tchoga Zanbil 40 km South-East of Susa (Elam, now in the Louvre (Sb5127, Sb5128)), two clay figurines of zebus dating back to 1400–1100 BC (now in the Louvre (Sb5800, Sb19323)) (Figure 49) — from Susa, a clay sculpture of a zebu (end of II thousand BC) — from the entrance to the ziggurat of Dur-Untash in Khuzestan (Figure 50).

              Figure 47                                          Figure 48                             Figure 49                     Figure 50
    

    The region of Gilan South of the Caspian sea served as a staging point on the migration path of the carriers of Late Harappan culture from the North-West of the Indian subcontinent to the North-Eastern Mediterranean. Here in the military-aristocratic necropolis of Marlik Tepe on the river Gohar Rud near Rudbar and on a number of sites around it dozens of clay ritual vessels of Marlik archaeological culture were found. They are all in the form of humpback bovines with a spout instead of a muzzle. They date back to 1500–1000 BC. Now they are stored in museums all around the world (Photographic Applications, Plate 6). Obviously, another kind of vessel with a handle and a top in the form of horns and a hump of zebu with a spout instead of a muzzle belongs to the same ceramic tradition (Photographic Applications, Plate 6, the Smithsonian Institution). Only in 53 officially investigated graves of Marlik Tepe and in the vicinity of Geshlag nearby 17 clay vessels of red (10 items) and gray or grayish-brown (7 items) colour in the form of zebu with a hypertrophied hump were excavated (out of the total number of vessels — 31). Twenty-nine bronze figurines of humpback bulls or cows (out of the total number of animal statuettes — 68) were excavated at the same Marlik Tepe. Of them ten statuettes are paired in harness with or without a plow and one has wheels. A bronze pin with the decoration in the form of a humped bull and a seal with a handle in the form of a zebu were also found in Marlik. Two more bronze figurines of zebu come from Gilan (Photographic Applications, Plate 7) as well as a gold cup with several repetitive images of a cow or a bull with a small hump (Figure 51).

          Figure 51                  Figure 52                Figure 53                               Figure 54                 Figure 55
    

    According to the chief excavator, humpback bulls had a special meaning for the people of Marlik. This is confirmed by the fact that a big hump, which was always hypertrophied, was added to the figurines of other animals such as deer (Figure 52) and rams (Figures 53–54), which do not have this body feature in real life, as well as to a ceramic vessel in the shape of a leopard and to a mountain goat on the handle of a bronze bell (Figure 55). According to estimates of Pilosaidi Katayun (2015), 32 clay vessels in the form of a zebu (out of the total number of 46 animal figurines found in Gilan) were described, catalogued and/or kept in museums. One figurine of a humped bull was mounted on four wheels (Figure 56).

           Figure 56                    Figure 57                Figure 58              Figure 59                  Figure 60
    

    The custom of the creators of Marlik Tepe to put images of humpback bulls and especially ritual vessels for libation in the form of a zebu into the graves (Figure 57) directly connects Marlikians with Late Harappan inhabitants of the North-West of South Asia. Terracotta figurines of humpback bulls were found in the cemetery of Sanauli (Western Uttar Pradesh, East of Yamuna) in the funeral inventory of the layers transitive from Mature to Late Harappa (2100–1800 BC). They served as handles for the covers of two clay vessels with funeral food (Figure 58). Excavations in 2018 just in 100 m from the cemetery of the Late Harappa led to the opening of seven graves of the Ochre Pottery or Copper Hoards Culture with an approximate dating of about 2000 BC. A comb with a handle in the form of a zebu was placed in one of the graves (Figure 59). A polychrome rhyton in the shape of a humped bull (now kept in the Musée national des arts asiatiques in Paris), but with a throat on the back of the neck, comes from Baluchistan and dates back to prior 2000 BC (Figure 60). In addition, the creators of the Cemetery H in Harappa-on-Ravi decorated pots placed in graves with ornamental belts with black images of zebu on red background (Figure 61).

    Figure 61 The tradition of casting single bronze figurines of zebu makes the culture of Marlik similar to the civilization of Mature Harappa, where such a statuette was found in Mohenjodaro (Figure 62).

          Figure 62                        Figure 63                     Figure 64                                       Figure 65
    

    The tradition of casting paired bronze statuettes of zebu teams, characteristic of the Marlikians, also directly echoes Late Harappan finds of the North-West of South Asia. A bronze composition of two zebus supporting a platform with a kneeling woman on it (2000–1750 BC) comes from Uttar Pradesh (Figure 63). A bronze chariot with a pair of humpback bulls that are part of the Daimabad Hoard (district Ahmednagar, Maharashtra) belongs to the Late Harappan epoch. (Figure 64) When drawing parallels between the archaeological culture of Marlik and Harappa, it should be pointed out that it is in Iranian Azerbaijan that the pure-blooded species of zebu, which is still very similar to the rock breeds of humped cattle of Afghanistan and Northern Pakistan, is found so far. There are stunted bulls humped like Indian zebu in the villages of Gilan and Mazandaran. Some Kassite rulers of Babylonia had Indo-Aryan throne names. On the seal of the Kassite king Na-zi-Ma-ru-ut-ta-aš (translated as «Maruttaš protects him», around 1300 BC), — i.e. one of the rulers, whose throne name included a theonym borrowed from Indo-Aryan, — a plow with a pair of humpback bulls harnessed to it is depicted (Figure 65). By order of Kassite kings of Babylonia stone landmarks (kudurru) with carved images were created. On two kudurrus of Meli-Shipak or Melishihu (XII century BC) a hunchbacked ram (the addition of a hump of a zebu to another species) and a zebu are carved (Figure 66).

    Figure 66

    V. CONCLUSION The spread of zebu cattle (depictions) from the Indus valley to the East Mediterranean region including Syria, Anatolia, Cyprus and Palestine correlates well with the present geographical distribution of human Y-haplogroups L-M11, R2 (R-L266) and R1a Z93 originating from Hindustan and of South Asian human genome K5 and South Indian human genome K16. Both sets of data correlate with maps showing the relative proportions of zebu admixture in the three genomic components (mitochondrial, autosomal and Y-chromosomal) from the present day cattle populations across the Near East. These human population and domestic humped cattle movements are to be connected with the dispersal of Indo-European languages (spoken — Indo-Aryan and Iranian — and extinct — Kassite and Mitanni Aryan and Anatolian) from Hindustan to Asia Minor in 7000–1000 BC.

    REFERENCES Akkermans P.M.M.G., Schwartz G.M. (2003) The Archaeology of Syria: From Complex Hunter-Gatherers to Early Urban Societies (c. 16,000–300 BC). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 467 p. Al-Khalesi Y.M. (1978) The Court of the Palms: A Functional Interpretation of the Mari Palace. Malibu. Undena Publications. VIII+85 p.+5 pl. Ahlström G.W. (1990) The Bull Figurine from Dhahrat Et-Tawileh. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. No. 280. Pp. 77–82. Alisharaf E.D.S. (2016) On the problem of relations between Iran and Central Asia in the bronze age (on the example of images on seals and their prints on ceramics). Thesis... candidate of historical sciences. Dushanbe. 204 p. (In Russ.) Art of the First Cities: The Third Millennium B.C. from the Mediterranean to the Indus. (2003) Eds. A. Joan & R. Wallenfels. NY. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. 540 p. A.T.C. (1910) Babylonian Section. An Ancient Plow. Expedition Magazine. Penn Museum. Volume 1. Issue 1. Pp. 4–6. Beyond Babylon. Art, Trade, and Diplomacy in the Second Millennium B.C. (2008) Eds. J. Aruz et al. NY–New Heaven–L. The Metropolitan Museum of Art; Yale University Press. 524 p. Biscione R. (1974) Relative chronology and pottery connections between Shahr-i Sokhta and Mundigak, Eastern Iran. Memorie del'Istituto Italiano di Paleontologia Umana. VoI. II. Pp. 131–145. Biscione R. (1981) Baluchistan presence in the ceramic assemblage of Period I at Shahr-i Sokhta. South Asian Archaeology 1981. Ed. by B. Allchin. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 69–80. Biscione R. et al. (1974) Archaeological Discoveries and Methodological Problems in the Excavations of Shahr-i Sokhta, Sistan. South Asian Archaeology 1973. Ed. by J. E. Van Lohuizen-De Leeuw & J. M. M. Ubaghs. Leiden. E.J. Brill. Pp. 12–52. Bökönyi S. (1997) Zebus and Indian Wild Cattle. Anthropozoologica. Num. 25–26. Pp. 647–654. Carter M.L. (1995) Museum Acquisitions and Notes. Bulletin of the Asia Institute. 9. Pp. 229–238. Chandra P. (1985) The Sculpture of India 3000 B.C. – 1300 A.D. Washington. National Gallery of Art. 224 p. Collon D. (1995) Ancient Near Eastern Art. Berkeley. University of California Press. 247 p. Cortesi E. et al. (2008) Cultural Relationships beyond the Iranian Plateau: The Helmand Civilization, Baluchistan and the Indus Valley in the 3rd Millennium BCE. Paléorient. V. 34, No.2. Pp. 5–35.

    Curtis J. (2005) Iron Age Iran and the Transition to the Achaemenid Period. Birth of the Persian Empire. Vol. I. Ed. by V.S. Curtis & S. Stewart. L.–NY. I.B. Tauris, The London Middle East Institute as SOAS & The British Museum. Pp. 112–131. Dhavalikar M.K. (1982) Daimabad Bronzes. Harappan Civilization. A Contemporary Perspective. Ed. by G.L. Possehl. New Delhi. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. & American Institute of Indian Studies; Warminster. Aris & Phillips in cooperation with American Institute of Indian Studies. Pp. 361–366. During-Caspers E.C.L. (1987) A copper–bronze animal in Harappan style from Bahrain: Evidence of mercantile interaction. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient. Vol. XXX. Pp. 30–46. Edwards C.J. et al. (2007) Taurine and zebu admixture in Near Eastern cattle: a comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal and Y-chromosomal data. Animal Genetics. 38. Pp. 520–524. Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967–1975. The Third Millennium. (2001) Eds. C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky et al. Cambridge, Massachusetts. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. 340 p. Fairservis W.A. (1956) Excavations in the Quetta Valley, West Pakistan. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol. 45. Part 2. NY. Pp. 165–402. Fairsevis W.A. (1961) Archaeological Studies in the Seistan Basin of South-Western Afghanistan and Eastern Iran. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol. 48. Part 1. NY. Pp. 1–128. Francfort H.–P. (2004) Animals in Reality, Art and Myths in the Oxus Civilization (BMAC): Bison, Deer. Near the Sources of Civilizations. Eds. Kosarev M.F. et al. M., Old garden. Pp. 182–192. Francfort H.–P., Pottier M.–H. (1978) Sondage préliminaire sur l'établissement protohistorique harappéen et postharappéen de Shortugaï (Afghanistan du N.-E.). Arts asiatiques. Tome 34. Pp. 29–86. Frenez D., Vidale M. (2014) Translated Symbols. Indus Reminiscences in a Carved Chlorite Artefact of the Halil Rud Civilization. Rivista di Archeologia. Anno XXXVIII. Venezia: Giorgio Bretschneider Editore, 2015. Pp. 7–18+IV tables. Grigson C. (2013) Early Cattle around the Indian Ocean. The Indian Ocean in Antiquity. Ed. by J. Reade. L.–NY. Routledge. Pp. 66–74. Haerinck E. (1988) The Iron Age in Guilan — Proposal for a Chronology. Bronzeworking Centres of Western Asia c. 1000–539 B.C. (colloquium at the British Museum 24–26 June 1986). Ed. by J. Curtis. L. & NY. Kegan Paul International; The British Museum. Pp. 63–78. Harmatta J. (1996) The emergence of the Indo-Iranians: the Indo-Iranian languages. History of Civilizations of Central Asia. Eds. A.H. Dani, V.M. Masson. Vol. I. Delhi. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. Pp. 357–378. Herbordt S. (2010) The Bulls on the Seals of Muwatalli II // Ipamati kistamati pari tumatimis. Luwian and Hittite Studies presented to J.D. Hawkins on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Ed. by I. Singer. Tel Aviv. Emery and Claire Yass Publications in Archaeology Institute of Archaeology Tel Aviv University. Pp. 123–130. Jarrige J.–F. et al. (2011) Shahr-i Sokhta and the chronology of the Indo-Iranian regions. Paléorient. Vol. 37.2. Pp. 7–34. Kohl Ph.L. (1975) Carved Chlorite Vessels: A Trade in Finished Commodities in the Mid-Third Millennium. Expedition. Pp. 18–31. Kurtik G.E. (2007) The star heaven of ancient Mesopotamia: Sumero-Akkadian names of constellations and other celestial bodies. SPb.: Aletheia. 744 p. Laneri N. & Vidale M. (1998) An Anatomy for the Truncated-Conical Bowls of Shahr-i Sokhta. East and West. Vol. 48. Nos. 3–4. Pp. 225–264. Lawler A. (2011) The World in Between. Archaeology. Vol. 64. No 6. Pp. 24–31. Levine E. et al. (2011) A Zebu-Shaped Weight from Tel Beth-Shemesh. Israel Exploration Journal. Vol. 61, No. 2. Pp. 146–161. Majidzadeh Y. (2003) Jiroft. The Earliest Oriental Civilization. Tehran. Printing and Publishing Organization of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. 218+20 p. Madjidzadeh Y. (2008) Excavations at Konar Sandal in the Region of Jiroft in the Halil Basin: First Preliminary Report (2002–2008). Iran. British Institute of Persian Studies. Vol. 46. Pp. 69–103. Matthews R. (2002) Zebu: harbingers of doom in Bronze Age western Asia? Antiquity. 76. Pp. 438–446. Mazar A. (1982) The ‘Bull Site’: An Iron Age I Open Cult Place. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. No. 247. Pp. 27–42. McMahon A. (2009) Once there was a place: settlement archaeology at Chagar Bazar, 1999–2002. Oxford. British Institute for the Study of Iraq. 427 p. Mode H. (1980–1981) The Four Quadrupeds — Reflections on Indian Animal Preference. Indologica Taurinensia. Vol. VIII–IX. Dr. L. Sternbach Commemoration Volume. Pp. 269–281. Moore Th. (2015) Old Hittite polychrome relief vases and the assertion of kingship in 16th century BCE Anatolia. A Master’s Thesis. Ankara. Department of Archaeology, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University. 161 p. Muscarella O.W. (1988) Bronze and Iron. Ancient Near Eastern Artifacts in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. NY. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. 501 p. Nashef K. (1990) Archaeology in Iraq. American Journal of Archaeology. 94-2. Pp. 259–289. Negahban E.O. (1964) A Brief Report on the Excavation of Marlik Tepe and Pileh Qal'eh. Iran. Vol. 2. Pp. 13–19. Negahban E.O. (1965) Notes on Some Objects from Marlik. Journal of Near Eastern Studies. Vol. 24, No. 4. Erich F. Schmidt Memorial Issue. Part Two. Pp. 309–327. Negahban E.O. (1965) The Treasures of Marlik. Archaeology. Vol. 18, No. 2. Pp. 109–112. Negahban E.O. (1977) The Seals of Marlik Tepe. Journal of Near Eastern Studies. Vol. 36, No. 2. Pp. 81–102. Negahban E.O. (1991) Excavations at Haft Tepe, Iran. Philadelphia: University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania. 156p.+7plans+13 fig.+58 pl. Negahban E.O. (1996) Marlik: The Complete Excavation Report. Vol. 1. Text. Vol. 2. Illustrations. Philadelphia. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania. 366 p.+140 pl. Nelson H.H. (1930) Earlier Historical Records of Ramses III. Chicago. University of Chicago. 54 pl. Oates D. et al. (1998) Excavations at Tell Brak. Vol. 1. L. British School of Archaeology in Iraq. Cambridge, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Oakville CT, David Brown Book Co. 296 p. Oliver P. (1960) The Second Millennium B.C. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin. Vol. 18, No. 8. Pp. 253–259. Perrot J., Madjidzadeh Y. (2003) Découvertes récentes à Jiroft (Sud du plateau iranien) (note d'information). Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. 147ᵉ année. N. 3. Pp. 1087–1102. Perrot J., Madjidzadeh Y. (2005) L'iconographie des vases et objets en chlorite de Jiroft (Iran). Paléorient. Vol. 31, No 2. Pp. 123–152. Piggott S. (1950) Prehistoric India to 1000 B.C. Harmondsworth. Penguin Books. 292 p. Piller Ch.K. (2008) Untersuchungen zur relative Chronologie der Nekropole von Marlik. Dissertation an der Fakultät für Kulturwissenschaften der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. München. 297 S. Pilosaidi Katayun. (2015) Ritual vessels and figurines of Gilan and Central Asia as a source of mythology of the Iranian peoples (end II – beginning I Millennium BC). Thesis... candidate of historical sciences. Dushanbe. 265 p. (In Russ.) Piperno M. & Tosi M. (1975) The Graveyard of Shahr-i Sokhta, Iran. Archaeology Magazine. Pp. 186–197. Pittman H. (1984) Art of the Bronze Age: Southeastern Iran, Western Central Asia, and the Indus Valley. NY. Metropolitan Museum of Art. 102 p. Prabhakar V.N. (2013) Ceramic Typology of the Late Harappan Cemetery at Sanauli, Uttar Pradesh. Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology. 1. Pp. 78–103. Rigveda. Metrically Restored Text. (2019) Eds. K. Thomson & J. Slocum. URL: http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/lrc/RV/ — date of circulation February 23, 2019. Salvatori S. & Vidale M. (1997) Shahr-i Sokhta 1975–1978: Central Quarters Excavations. Preliminary Report. Roma: IsIAO. 185 p. Santini G. (1990) A Preliminary Note on Animal Figurines from Shahr-i Sokhta. South Asian Archaeology 1987. Part 1. Ed. by M. Taddei & P. Gallieri. Rome. Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente. Pp. 427–451. Sarianidi V.I. (1986) Le complexe cultuel de Togolok 21 en Margiane. Arts asiatiques. Tome 41. Pp. 5–21. Sarianidi V.I. (1990) Antiquities of Margush country. Ashgabat. Ylim. 314 p. (In Russ.) Sarianidi V.I. (1997) Gonur Temenos. Bulletin of ancient history. No 1. Pp. 148–168. (In Russ.) Sarianidi V. (2002) Margush. Ancient Oriental Kingdom in the Old Delta of the Murghab river. Aşgabat. Türkmendöwlethabarlary. 359 p. Sarianidi V. (2008) Margush. Mystery and Truth of the Great Culture. Aşgabat: Türkmendöwlethabarlary. 341 p. Sataev R.M. (2016) Animals in the culture of ancient Margiana. M. Old garden. 196 p. Semenenko A.A. (2014) Preliminary data on anthropological and archaeological traces of Indo-European migration from the South Asia through the steppe zone into the South-Eastern Europe. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. History. Political science. Economics. Information technologies. No 8 (179). Issue 30. Pp. 5–12. (In Russ.) Semenenko A.A., Tonoyan-Belyayev I.A. (2015) On some possible lexical parallels between Old Indo-Aryan and Sumerian (in view of probable Indo-Aryan attribution of the Harappan civilization). Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. History. Political. No 13 (210). Issue 35. Pp. 5–11. (In Russ.) Singer I. (2006) The failed reforms of Akhenaten and Muwatalli. BMSAES. Issue 6. Pp. 37–58. Sharma D.V. et al. (2006) Excavations at Sanauli 2005-06: A Harappan Necropolis in the Upper Ganga-Yamuna Doab. Puratattva. 36. Pp. 166–179. Speiser E.A. (1935) Excavations at Tepe Gawra. Vol. I. Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. 220 p.+LXXXVI pl. The Everlasting Flame: Zoroastrianism in History and Imagination. (2013) Ed. by S. Stewart. L.–NY. I. B. Tauris, SOAS, University of London & British Library. XIX+259 p. The Royal City of Susa: Ancient Near Eastern Treasures in the Louvre. (1992) Eds. P.O. Harper, J. Aruz, F. Tallon. NY. Metropolitan Museum of Art. 316 p. Tosi M. (1969) Excavations at Shahr-i Sokhta. Preliminary Report on the Second Campaign, September–December 1968. East and West. New Series. Vol. 19. Nos. 3–4. Pp. 283–386. Tosi M. (1971) Seistan in the bronze age — excavations in Shahr-i Sokhta. Soviet archaeology. No 3. Pp. 15–30. (In Russ.) Transactions of Margiana archaeological expedition. (2008) Vol. 2. Eds. V. Sarianidi et al. M. Old garden. 253 p. (In Russ.) Transactions of the Margiana Archaeological Expedition. (2014) Vol. 5. Eds. V. Sarianidi et al. M. Old garden. 256 p. (In Russ.) Transactions of Margiana Archaeological Expedition. (2016) Vol. 6. Eds. N. A. Dubova et al. M. Old garden. 580 p. (In Russ.) Treister M. & Yablonsky L. (2016) Bronze lamp in form of reclining zebu bull from Filippovka. Monographie Instrumentum 52. Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress on Ancient Bronzes, Izmir. Eds. A. Giumlia-Mair & C.C. Mattusch. Autun. Éditions Mergoil. Pp. 71–78. Van De Mieroop M. (2010) The Eastern Mediterranean in the Age of Ramesses II. Malden–Oxford–Chichester. Wiley–Blackwell; John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 312 p. Van der Geer A.E. (2008) Animals in Stone: Indian Mammals Sculptured Through Time. Leiden. Boston: Brill. 461 p. Van Loon M. N. (1985) Anatolia in the Second Millennium B.C. Leiden: E. J. Brill. 47 p.+XLVI pl. Vats M.S. (1940) Excavations at Harappā. In two volumes with plans and plates. V. II. 139 Plates. Delhi: Manager of Publications. 139 pl. Vidale M. (2015) Searching for Mythological Themes on the “Jiroft” Chlorite Artefacts. Iranica Antiqua. Vol. L. Pp. 15–59. Vidale M., Frenez D. (2015) Indus Components in the Iconography of a White Marble Cylinder Seal from Konar Sandal South (Kerman, Iran). South Asian Studies. Vol. 31, No. 1. Pp. 144–154. Wilhelm G. (1992) Ancient people Hurrians. M. Science. 158 p. (In Russ.) Winkelmann S. (2013) Transformation of Near Eastern animal motifs in Murghabo-Bactrian Bronze Age art. Animals, Gods and Men from East to West. Papers on archaeology and history in honour of Roberta Venco Ricciardi. Eds. A. Peruzzetto et al. BAR International Series 2516. Pp. 47–64. Yıldırım T. (2008) New scenes on the second relief vase from Hüseyindede and their interpretation in the light of the Hittite representative art. Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici. Vol. L–2008. Roma. CNR – Istituto di Studi Sulle Civilta dell’Egeo e del Vicino Oriente. Pp. 837–846.

All peer review content displayed here is covered by a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license.