Journal

Journal of Critical Care

Field
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Published by
Reviews

119

Interested in reviewing for this journal?
Editors on Publons
Top reviewers on Publons (Manuscripts reviewed in last 12 months)
Endorsed by

Reviews

  • Abstract: Objective unclear. What is meant by received? Mehods: What about the false negative categorizarion using ICD-9-CM codes Methods do not describe the methodology. It has only the definitions. Results: had more CAM-ICU assessments- more frequent of assessments or higher rating? Conclusion: What is the basis for the conclusion of over-sampling hyperactive/mixed, and under-sampling hypoactive Methods: Were any of these patients sedated or were on ventilator? Could that influence the categorization? Statistical Analysis: A Chi square test may not be adequate for the assessment of performance ICD-9-CM codes. Some goodness of fit tests may be require (caliberation) and test for discriminatory ability(c statistic) . How does the sensitivity analysis using modified the diagnostic criterion of delirium ≥2 positive CAMICU test robustness of the primary analysis. What is the rationale in using the changed criteria. If this was better then when why was the performance tested against a different criteria? Results: “and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation (P<0.001) and dialysis (P=0.004)”- were patients with delirium likely to require mechanical ventilation and dialysis or patients requiring these more likely to be delirious? Thirty-two patients had an ICD-9-CM code for delirium but did not have a positive CAM-ICU rating- could this result from including more codes as delirium –justify Discussion “metabolic encephalopathy” was one of the best predictors of the delirium, as 19% of patients with delirium (81/423) received this code. What is the basis for regarding “metabolic encephalopathy” as predictor? This was not assessed! “However, a sensitivity analysis limited the diagnosis of delirium to 2 or more CAM-ICU ratings supported the results of the primary analysis”? What do the authors mean by this over-sampling hyperactive/mixed type delirium patients? The specificity was high so why would there be over-sampling?

    Grammar Received documentation-? Do you mean were documented as delirious? Documentation of delirium was defined as- Was documentation defined or delirium defined? codes that was not the performance characteristics of 32 ICD9-CM codes for identifying delirium were a sensitivity of 36% and specificity of 95% We found that duration of delirium (larger counts of positive CAM-ICU ratings) and severe agitation were independent predictors of ICD- 9-CM codes for delirium-reframe the sentence. Independent predictor for being coded for delirium as per ICD-9-CM

    Reviewed by
    Ongoing discussion
  • Reviewed by
    Ongoing discussion