Sónia Frota


I'm Associate Professor at the Department of Linguistics, School of Arts and Humanities of the University of Lisbon, and Director of the Phonetics Laboratory and of the Lisbon Baby Lab. My research focuses on Prosody in language, comprising phrasing, intonation, and rhythm, and using laboratory-based approaches. Prosody is a fascinating domain, as it comprehends sub-syllabic units to sentence-level or even discourse-level units, it interfaces with morphology and syntax, it is relevant to information structure, language processing, or human interaction, and it plays a crucial role in language acquisition. In my work, I study phrasal prosody and intonation, seeking to understand the properties of prosodic systems, the extent to which they vary across and within languages, and how they are acquired by infants. I also study how prosodic cues may help bootstrapping the learning of language, and may function as early markers of language impairment. I'm the Editor-in chief of Journal of Portuguese Linguistics and Associate Editor of Phonetica.

Research Fields

Social Sciences

Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.



Reviews (last 12 months)


Reviews (average per year)






Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Sónia Frota has reviewed for.

Sónia Frota

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Sónia Frota's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Sónia Frota each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.