Profile
Statistics

Guillaume Chapron

Bio

Guillaume Chapron started his career by mistakenly becoming a vet (DVM 1998) before becoming addicted on population modeling during his Master (MSc 2000) and defending his PhD (2004) at the Université Pierre & Marie Curie in Paris, France. His research interest focuses on anything that puts large carnivores into numbers, such as viability analysis, adaptive management and any other carnivore conservation questions. He uses different approaches, from simple deterministic models to complex hierarchical state-space models, without forgetting Individual Based Models. He is also very much interested in quantitatively understanding the political aspects and mechanisms of biodiversity conservation.

Research Fields

Ecological Applications

Editorial Board Memberships
Current Memberships
Past Memberships
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

82

Reviews (last 12 months)

28

Reviews (average per year)

7

Merit

317

Openness

0.0%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Guillaume Chapron has reviewed for.

Guillaume Chapron

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Guillaume Chapron's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Guillaume Chapron each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.