Manuel Galvão de Melo e Mota


Manuel M. Mota: Dept. Biologia, Universidade de Évora.

Dr. Mota has completed a PhD in Virginia Tech in 1992, in Phytonematology, and has since worked with plant parasitic nematodes, namely Globodera, virus vector nematodes, entomopathogenic nematodes and Bursaphelenchus. In 1998 he established the Nematology Lab (NemaLab) in the university of Évora and has been able to attract funding from several projects (over € 1 million). He has published over 60 papers in major nematological journals such as Molecular Plant Pathology, BMC Microbiology, FEMS Microbiology, Planta, New Phytologist, PLoS ONE, J. of Nematology, Nematology and others , editor of 2 books (Brill and Springer) and numerous book chapters. His is a regular referee for 15 major scientific journals. His main scientific achievement was the detection for the first time in the EU of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, and has since then (1999) pursued a steady and coherent line of research. Recent interest has focused on virus-vector nematodes (Fam. Longidoridae) as well.

Editorial Board Memberships

Manuel is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Has reviewed for

Showing 6 of 46  

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.



Reviews (last 12 months)


Reviews (average per year)






Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Manuel Galvão de Melo e Mota has reviewed for.

Manuel Galvão de Melo e Mota

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Manuel Galvão de Melo e Mota's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Manuel Galvão de Melo e Mota each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.