Profile
Statistics

Chiavaioli Francesco

Bio

I received MEng degree summa cum laude in Telecommunications Engineering in 2008 and got PhD in 2012 from the University of Siena (Italy). I'm currently working as Post-doc at IFAC-CNR in the design and characterization of optical fiber sensors, especially those based on optical fiber gratings, to be used for sensing/bio-sensing purposes; new pH probes based on plastic optical fiber to be used in the field of biomedicine; use of LPGs to couple light into whispering gallery mode micro-resonators; SPR-based optical fiber sensors and biosensors; light modulation with graphene; graphene-based resonant nanostructures.

Research Fields

Biomedical Engineering

Editorial Board Memberships

Chiavaioli is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

100

Reviews (last 12 months)

15

Reviews (average per year)

17

Merit

300

Openness

0.0%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Chiavaioli Francesco has reviewed for.

Chiavaioli Francesco

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Chiavaioli Francesco's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Chiavaioli Francesco each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.