Robert Keith Shaw


Robert has managed research projects in science, education and public policy. His affinity is for "everything to do with science". He is active in business research, particularly the development of innovative business research methodologies. Recent projects are about the interface between China and the West. He supports the Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia, the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, the Philosophy of Management, the New Zealand Association of Science Educators and the Royal Society of New Zealand.

Robert's theoretical work mainly relates to Kant, Heidegger and Heelan, ontology, phenomenology, concepts of truth, the hermeneutic philosophy of science and the foundations of business research methods. Some of his research is about curriculum theory and curriculum design, science and e-learning.

Editorial Board Memberships
Current Memberships
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.



Reviews (last 12 months)


Reviews (average per year)






Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Robert Keith Shaw has reviewed for.

Robert Keith Shaw

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Robert Keith Shaw's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Robert Keith Shaw each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.