Profile
Statistics

Gavin Thomas Lumsden Brown

Bio

My research investigates the relationship of assessment qualities and purposes on student and teacher responses to assessment including learning outcomes across a variety of cultural and social contexts. My research has shown that teacher and student beliefs are (1) contingent on assessment quality, (2) consistent with cultural values and priorities, and (3) play a significant part in explaining adaptive and maladaptive outcomes. Further, my research has shown that improvement is best achieved through high-quality assessment practices and systems that provide rich feedback to both test-users and test-takers and that this outcome is contingent on ensuring low-stakes consequences are attached to assessments.

Research Fields

Education Social Sciences

Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Has reviewed for

Showing 6 of 45  

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

163

Reviews (last 12 months)

28

Reviews (average per year)

19

Merit

487

Openness

0.0%

Review to Publication ratio

1:0.4


Journal Impact factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Gavin Thomas Lumsden Brown has reviewed for.

Gavin Thomas Lumsden Brown

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Gavin Thomas Lumsden Brown's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Gavin Thomas Lumsden Brown each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review (for which we have content), compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.