Profile
Statistics

Sajan Daniel George

Bio

Researcher/Academician with an advanced degree and experience in Research and Development, Project Management, Lab Management, Design and Implementation of experimental setups. Proven record of technical achievement in high tech areas such as Thermo-optic characterization of materials, Biomedical Applications of Laser, Manipulation of micro and nanoparticles using optical tweezers, stimuli induced change in wetting properties of the materials, nanofluids, wettability, design and development instruments.

Areas of Research: Nanobioimaging, Wettability, Micro/Optofluidics, Photothermal Methods, Laser Spectroscopy

Research Fields

Condensed Matter Physics

Editorial Board Memberships
Current Memberships
Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

54

Reviews (last 12 months)

8

Reviews (average per year)

5

Merit

177

Openness

24.1%

Review to Publication ratio

27:1


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Sajan Daniel George has reviewed for.

Sajan Daniel George

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Sajan Daniel George's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Sajan Daniel George each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.