Profile
Statistics

Xinyan Huang

Bio

Dr Huang is an Assistant Professor at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. He is a Combustion Scientist and a Fire Protection Engineer. He received his PhD (2016) from Imperial College London, where he investigated the Smouldering Combustion of Peat, the largest fire phenomenon on Earth. Before that, he performed research on the Ignition and Flame Spread Theory during his MSc (2012) at University of California, San Diego, and on the Solar Energy during his BE (2010) at Southeast University, China. Prior to joining PolyU, Dr Huang was a Postdoc and Lecturer at University of California, Berkeley where he conducted research with NASA and JAXA on the Microgravity Combustion and Fire Safety in the International Space Station.

Editorial Board Memberships
Current Memberships
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Post Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

196

Reviews (last 12 months)

57

Reviews (average per year)

24

Merit

734

Openness

0.8%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Xinyan Huang has reviewed for.

Xinyan Huang

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Xinyan Huang's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Xinyan Huang each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.