Profile
Statistics

Daniele Sampietro

Bio

Dr. Daniele Sampietro is BOD member and senior researcher in GReD s.r.l. He received is PhD degree with honours in 2009, whit a thesis on the inverse gravimetric problem with GOCE data. He has been principal investigator of the GEMMA project (GOCE Exploitation for Moho Modeling and Application), funded by ESA in the framework of STSE programme from 2011 to 2012. He has been involved in the FP7 project “GAL – Galileo for Gravity” and he in the national project “GOCE-ITALY”. He won the AGLC “Licio Cernoboro” award for young researchers in the “Applied Geophysics” session of the 32nd national conference GNGTS. He has been guest editor of the Vol. 54, n.4, December 2013 of the “Bolletino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata”.

The main research activity concerns the processing and interpretation of the Earth’s gravity field with particular attention to the observations of the GOCE satellite mission. Other areas of research include statistical data analysis, with applications to the estimation of the geoid and surveying integrating classical observations with GNSS data.

Research Fields

Geodesy Geophysics Gravity

Editorial Board Memberships
Current Memberships
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

60

Reviews (last 12 months)

18

Reviews (average per year)

11

Merit

180

Openness

0.0%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Daniele Sampietro has reviewed for.

Daniele Sampietro

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Daniele Sampietro's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Daniele Sampietro each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.